Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Powell, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Floyd Junior Powell's motion to reduce his sentence. Powell had appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6631

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Floyd Junior Powell's motion to reduce his sentence. Powell had appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Powell, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Floyd Junior Powell's motion to reduce his sentence. Powell had appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the reasons provided by the district court for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6631

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL, a/k/a Dick,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Richard L.
    Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00012-RLV-6)

    Submitted:

    June 7, 2010

    Decided:

    June 23, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    for

    reduction

    of

    sentence

    pursuant

    to

    18

    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    See United States v.

    Powell, No. 5:99-cr-00012-RLV-6 (W.D.N.C. April 16, 2010).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like