Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jong Cha, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jong Woo Cha's Motion for Sentence Adjustment. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its December 3, 2010 order and December 6, 2010 order denying Cha's motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-07-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6079

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jong Woo Cha's Motion for Sentence Adjustment. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its December 3, 2010 order and December 6, 2010 order denying Cha's motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Jong Cha, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jong Woo Cha's Motion for Sentence Adjustment. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its December 3, 2010 order and December 6, 2010 order denying Cha's motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6079

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JONG WOO CHA, a/k/a Sky,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (1:06-cr-00482-GBL-1)

    Submitted:

    June 30, 2011

    Decided:

    July 6, 2011

    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jong Woo Cha, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jong

    Woo

    Cha

    appeals

    the

    district

    denying Chas Motion for Sentence Adjustment.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Cha,

    Dec.

    No.

    1:06-cr-00482-GBL-1

    entered Dec. 6, 2010).

    (E.D.

    Va.

    filed

    3,

    2010

    &

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like