Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Leggett, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Donald Edward Leggett appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated, noting that Leggett's designation as a career offender precluded relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6080

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Donald Edward Leggett appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated, noting that Leggett's designation as a career offender precluded relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Leggett, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Donald Edward Leggett appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated, noting that Leggett's designation as a career offender precluded relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6080

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DONALD EDWARD LEGGETT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (7:01-cr-00037-F-1)

    Submitted:

    April 23, 2009

    Decided:

    May 5, 2009

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donald Edward Leggett, Appellant Pro Se.


    Anne Margaret Hayes,
    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Donald

    Edward

    Leggett

    appeals

    from

    the

    district

    courts order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18


    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    See United States v.

    Leggett, No. 7:01-cr-00037-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2009) (noting


    that

    Leggetts

    relief).

    designation

    as

    career

    offender

    precluded

    We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like