Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Terry Jones, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Terry D. Jones appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7720

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Terry D. Jones appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Terry Jones, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Terry D. Jones appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7720

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TERRY D. JONES, a/k/a Rick,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (4:95-cr-00037-RGD-1)

    Submitted:

    May 24, 2012

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    DAVIS,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    May 30, 2012

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Terry D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.


    Lisa Rae McKeel, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Terry
    denying

    his

    D.

    Jones

    motion

    for

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.
    order.

    the

    sentence

    district

    reduction

    courts

    under

    18

    order
    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts

    United States v. Terry, No. 4:95-cr-00037-RGD-1 (E.D.

    Va. Nov. 22, 2011).


    facts

    appeals

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like