Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gerald Hinds, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gerald Hinds' motion for a reduction of his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on September 5, 2013 and entered on September 11, 2013. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-03-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7834

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gerald Hinds' motion for a reduction of his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on September 5, 2013 and entered on September 11, 2013. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    17 views2 pages

    United States v. Gerald Hinds, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Gerald Hinds' motion for a reduction of his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on September 5, 2013 and entered on September 11, 2013. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7834

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    GERALD A. HINDS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (3:00-cr-00319-JRS-1)

    Submitted:

    March 24, 2014

    Decided:

    March 27, 2014

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gerald A. Hinds, Appellant Pro


    Robert E. Trono, Assistant United
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Se. Michael Ronald Gill,


    States Attorneys, Richmond,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gerald

    Hinds

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    granting his motion for a reduction of his sentence.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    States

    v.

    Hinds,

    No.

    3:00-cr-00319-JRS-1

    Sept. 5, 2013 & entered Sept. 11, 2013).

    (E.D.

    order

    United

    Va.

    filed

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like