Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Richard A. Santiago, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Richard Santiago's motion for a sentence reduction. The district court had denied the motion for reasons adequately stated. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's conclusions. Oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-05-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7934

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Richard Santiago's motion for a sentence reduction. The district court had denied the motion for reasons adequately stated. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's conclusions. Oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Richard A. Santiago, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Richard Santiago's motion for a sentence reduction. The district court had denied the motion for reasons adequately stated. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's conclusions. Oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7934

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    RICHARD A. SANTIAGO, a/k/a Rick,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1)

    Submitted:

    May 18, 2016

    Decided:

    May 20, 2016

    Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Richard A. Santiago, Appellant Pro Se.


    Miller, Assistant United States Attorney,
    for Appellee.

    Angela MastandreaRichmond, Virginia,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Richard
    denying

    A.

    his

    Santiago

    motion

    appeals

    for

    no

    reasons

    reversible

    pursuant

    to

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    are

    argument

    adequately

    court.

    affirm

    because

    presented

    in

    United

    for

    the

    We

    conclusions

    district

    we

    Santiago, No. 3:06-cr-00515-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2015).


    oral

    the

    reduction

    order

    v.

    with

    by

    error.

    courts

    States

    dispense

    stated

    district

    sentence

    18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012).


    find

    the

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like