Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sanders v. US Dept of The Army, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Richard Sanders appealed a district court ruling dismissing his civil action against the U.S. Army. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding the case was barred by res judicata. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling that dismissed the case for the reasons stated in its April 20, 2004 order. The appeals court denied Sanders' motion opposing an extension of time and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-10-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1691

    Original Title

    Sanders v. US Dept of the Army, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Richard Sanders appealed a district court ruling dismissing his civil action against the U.S. Army. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding the case was barred by res judicata. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling that dismissed the case for the reasons stated in its April 20, 2004 order. The appeals court denied Sanders' motion opposing an extension of time and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Sanders v. US Dept of The Army, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Sanders appealed a district court ruling dismissing his civil action against the U.S. Army. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding the case was barred by res judicata. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling that dismissed the case for the reasons stated in its April 20, 2004 order. The appeals court denied Sanders' motion opposing an extension of time and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1691

    RICHARD D. SANDERS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, District
    Judge. (CA-03-641-3)

    Submitted:

    October 14, 2004

    Decided:

    October 19, 2004

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Richard D. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE


    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Richard D. Sanders appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his civil action finding that it is barred by res
    judicata.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    See Sanders v. United States Dept of the Army,

    No. CA-03-641-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 2004).

    We deny Sanders motion

    opposing the governments request for an extension of time to file


    its informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like