Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shabazz v. Hamlett, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Talib Shabazz filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Shabazz appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Shabazz's § 1983 complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-07-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6479

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Talib Shabazz filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Shabazz appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Shabazz's § 1983 complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Shabazz v. Hamlett, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Talib Shabazz filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Shabazz appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Shabazz's § 1983 complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6479

    TALIB D. SHABAZZ,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HAMLETT, Lieutenant; SHIFLETT, Unit Manager;
    SUSSEX II STATE PRISON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (CA-03-192-3)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 2004

    Decided:

    July 16, 2004

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Talib D. Shabazz, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant


    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Talib D. Shabazz appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Shabazz v.

    Hamlett, No. CA-03-192-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2004).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like