Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lott v. US Army, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darrell Lott's civil action against the United States Army. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for granting the Army's motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals also denied the Army's motions to strike. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-04-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-2732

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darrell Lott's civil action against the United States Army. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for granting the Army's motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals also denied the Army's motions to strike. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Lott v. US Army, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darrell Lott's civil action against the United States Army. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for granting the Army's motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals also denied the Army's motions to strike. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-2732

    DARRELL R. LOTT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES ARMY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-97-536)
    Submitted:

    April 16, 1998

    Decided:

    April 28, 1998

    Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Darrell R. Lott, Appellant Pro Se. Major Thomas Mercer Ray, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appellee's motion to dismiss in his civil action. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court and deny Appellee's motions to strike. Lott v. United States
    Army, No. CA-97-536 (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like