Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lloyd v. Barnett, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Rickey Lloyd filed a § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Lloyd appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling without need for oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7192

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rickey Lloyd filed a § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Lloyd appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling without need for oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Lloyd v. Barnett, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rickey Lloyd filed a § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Lloyd appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying relief. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling without need for oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7192

    RICKEY R. LLOYD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    TALMADGE BARNETT; J. J. CLARK,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
    Judge. (CA-95-519-5-BO)
    Submitted:

    February 27, 1997

    Decided:

    March 11, 1997

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Rickey R. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Coull Wilson, Associate
    Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd
    v. Barnett, No. CA-95-519-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like