Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Donnie Austin, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Donnie J. Austin appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons provided for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-03-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7881

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Donnie J. Austin appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons provided for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Donnie Austin, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Donnie J. Austin appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons provided for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7881

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    DONNIE J. AUSTIN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:02-cr-00124-HEH-1)

    Submitted:

    March 20, 2013

    Decided:

    March 22, 2013

    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donnie J. Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Donnie J. Austin appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    under

    reduction of sentence.
    reversible error.

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2)

    (2006)

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Austin, No. 3:02-cr-

    00124-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2012).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like