Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Eugene Johnson, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Eugene Johnson's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Johnson's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6017

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Eugene Johnson's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Johnson's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Eugene Johnson, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Eugene Johnson's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Johnson's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6017

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    EUGENE JOHNSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Senior
    District Judge. (3:90-cr-00113-JRS-1)

    Submitted:

    May 26, 2016

    Decided:

    June 1, 2016

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit


    Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eugene Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Dominick Salvatore Gerace, II,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene

    Johnson

    appeals

    from

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence


    reduction.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Johnson, No. 3:90-cr-00113-JRS-

    1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like