Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Sean Robinson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Sean Anthony Robinson's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 26, 2011 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-06-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6266

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Sean Anthony Robinson's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 26, 2011 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Sean Robinson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Sean Anthony Robinson's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 26, 2011 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6266

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    SEAN ANTHONY ROBINSON, a/k/a Black,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:06-cr-00204-HEH-1)

    Submitted:

    June 16, 2011

    Before NIEMEYER and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    GREGORY,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    June 20, 2011

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sean Anthony Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant,


    II, Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Sean
    order

    denying

    Anthony

    Robinson

    his

    U.S.C.

    18

    reduction of sentence.
    reversible error.

    appeals

    the

    3582(c)(2)

    district

    (2006)

    courts

    motion

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Robinson, No. 3:06-cr-

    00204-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2011).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like