Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Horvath, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Ritchie John Horvath, III appealed the district court's denial of his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The district court had denied Horvath's motion for modification of sentence and denied reconsideration of that ruling. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in the district court's orders dated September 2, 2008 and September 18, 2008.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8166

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ritchie John Horvath, III appealed the district court's denial of his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The district court had denied Horvath's motion for modification of sentence and denied reconsideration of that ruling. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in the district court's orders dated September 2, 2008 and September 18, 2008.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Horvath, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ritchie John Horvath, III appealed the district court's denial of his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The district court had denied Horvath's motion for modification of sentence and denied reconsideration of that ruling. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in the district court's orders dated September 2, 2008 and September 18, 2008.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8166

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RITCHIE JOHN HORVATH, III,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Danville.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (4:05-cr-00008-FFF-6)

    Submitted:

    February 19, 2009

    Decided:

    February 25, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ritchie John Horvath, III, Appellant Pro Se.


    Anthony Paul
    Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ritchie

    John

    Horvath,

    III,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts orders denying his motion for modification of sentence


    under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See United States v. Horvath, No. 4:05-cr-00008-FFF-6

    (W.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2008; Sept. 18, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like