Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Hughes, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    John Eric Hughes appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider an order denying his motion to correct his presentence report. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, denying Hughes' motion to supplement his brief and argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6669

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Eric Hughes appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider an order denying his motion to correct his presentence report. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, denying Hughes' motion to supplement his brief and argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Hughes, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Eric Hughes appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider an order denying his motion to correct his presentence report. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, denying Hughes' motion to supplement his brief and argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6669

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOHN ERIC HUGHES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2)

    Submitted:

    October 19, 2010

    Decided:

    October 27, 2010

    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se.


    Michael Cornell Wallace,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John Eric Hughes appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    Hughes

    motion

    to

    for

    reconsideration

    correct

    his

    of

    presentence

    an

    order

    report.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    denying
    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Hughes, No. 3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 31,


    2009).

    We deny Hughes motion to supplement the appellate brief

    and dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like