Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Johnson v. U.S. Department of Justice, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Barry Johnson appealed the district court's dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice and others. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion states that the appeals court reviewed the record and agrees with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-03-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7680

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Barry Johnson appealed the district court's dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice and others. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion states that the appeals court reviewed the record and agrees with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Johnson v. U.S. Department of Justice, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Barry Johnson appealed the district court's dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice and others. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The unpublished opinion states that the appeals court reviewed the record and agrees with the district court's reasons for dismissing the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7680

    BARRY JOHNSON,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Joshua Royster,
    Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCC Butner, Mid-Atlantic Region,
    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03002-FL)

    Submitted:

    February 24, 2011

    Decided:

    March 3, 2011

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Barry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Barry

    Johnson

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his action for damages pursuant to the Federal Torts


    Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346(b) (2006).
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Johnson v. United

    States Dept of Justice, No. 5:10-ct-03002-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5,


    2010).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like