Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. White, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bobby Ray White Jr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit stated that it had reviewed the record and the reasons given by the district court were adequate. The Fourth Circuit decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7433

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bobby Ray White Jr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit stated that it had reviewed the record and the reasons given by the district court were adequate. The Fourth Circuit decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. White, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bobby Ray White Jr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit stated that it had reviewed the record and the reasons given by the district court were adequate. The Fourth Circuit decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7433

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    BOBBY RAY WHITE, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:98-cr-00158-BO-1)

    Submitted:

    June 17, 2010

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    KING,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    June 23, 2010

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bobby Ray White, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes,
    Rudolph A. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Bobby
    order

    denying

    Ray
    his

    White,
    18

    sentence reduction.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    Jr.,

    U.S.C.

    appeals

    3582(c)

    the

    (2006)

    argument

    adequately

    courts

    motion

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    5:98-cr-00158-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2009).


    oral

    district

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    v.

    White,

    No.

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like