Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bailey-El v. Compton, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Ronald Bailey-El, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 18, 2004 order denying Bailey-El's petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7260

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronald Bailey-El, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 18, 2004 order denying Bailey-El's petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Bailey-El v. Compton, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronald Bailey-El, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 18, 2004 order denying Bailey-El's petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7260

    RONALD G. BAILEY-EL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    B.G. COMPTON; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (CA-03-806-7-SGW)

    Submitted:

    December 9, 2004

    Decided:

    December 15, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald G. Bailey-El, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald G. Bailey-El, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on his petition filed under
    28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    See Bailey-El v. Compton, No. CA-03-806-7-SGW

    (W.D. Va. filed June 17, 2004 & entered June 18, 2004).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like