Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Johnson v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    John Henry Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Johnson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral argument was not necessary to aid in its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-04-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6024

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Henry Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Johnson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral argument was not necessary to aid in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Johnson v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Henry Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Johnson a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral argument was not necessary to aid in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6024

    JOHN HENRY JOHNSON,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH M. BROOKS,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (CA-01-851)

    Submitted:

    March 20, 2002

    Decided:

    April 8, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John Henry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John Henry Johnson seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.


    certificate

    of

    appealability

    and

    reasoning of the district court.


    (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2001).

    Accordingly, we deny a

    dismiss

    the

    appeal

    on

    the

    Johnson v. Brooks, No. CA-01-851

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like