Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Johnson v. Edwards, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Kenneth Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the police chief and town manager of Gate City, Virginia. The district court denied relief and Johnson appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning in denying the complaint. The appeals court also determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6996

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kenneth Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the police chief and town manager of Gate City, Virginia. The district court denied relief and Johnson appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning in denying the complaint. The appeals court also determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Johnson v. Edwards, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the police chief and town manager of Gate City, Virginia. The district court denied relief and Johnson appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning in denying the complaint. The appeals court also determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6996

    KENNETH WAYNE JOHNSON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GERALD COX, Police Department Chief; MIKE
    EDWARDS, Town Manager of Gate City, Virginia,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-01-365-7)

    Submitted:

    November 29, 2001

    Decided:

    December 5, 2001

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Kenneth Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth Johnson appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.
    May 25, 2001).

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    Johnson v. Edwards, No. CA-01-365-7 (W.D. Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like