Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gary Davis, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Gary L. Davis appealed the district court's denial of his second motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Davis's second motion to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7313

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gary L. Davis appealed the district court's denial of his second motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Davis's second motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Gary Davis, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gary L. Davis appealed the district court's denial of his second motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Davis's second motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7313

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    GARY L. DAVIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:90-cr-00085-MOC-7)

    Submitted:

    December 13, 2012

    Decided:

    December 18, 2012

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gary L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gary
    denying his

    L.

    Davis

    motion

    for

    appeals
    a

    second

    the

    district

    sentence

    courts

    reduction

    order

    under

    18

    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    United States v. Davis,

    No. 3:90-cr-00085-MOC-7 (W.D.N.C. July 24, 2012).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like