Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Bobby Hughes, JR., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit also denied Hughes' motion for appointment of counsel, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6753

    Original Title

    United States v. Bobby Hughes, Jr., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit also denied Hughes' motion for appointment of counsel, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Bobby Hughes, JR., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order denying the motion. The Fourth Circuit also denied Hughes' motion for appointment of counsel, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6753

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    BOBBY SAMUEL HUGHES, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-1)

    Submitted:

    September 20, 2012

    Decided:

    November 2, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Gurney Wingate
    Grant, II, David Thomas Maguire, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United
    States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    we affirm the district courts order.
    No.

    3:00-cr-00004-JRS-1

    (E.D.

    Va.

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    Accordingly,

    United States v. Hughes,

    Apr.

    6,

    Hughes motion for appointment of counsel.


    oral

    We have

    and

    materials

    2012).

    We

    deny

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like