Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Haywood Chavis, JR., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    Haywood Lee Chavis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated. The Fourth Circuit also denied Chavis's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-12-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7171

    Original Title

    United States v. Haywood Chavis, Jr., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Haywood Lee Chavis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated. The Fourth Circuit also denied Chavis's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    United States v. Haywood Chavis, JR., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Haywood Lee Chavis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny the motion for the reasons stated. The Fourth Circuit also denied Chavis's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7171

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    HAYWOOD LEE CHAVIS, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (4:04-cr-00087-WDK-JEB-2)

    Submitted:

    November 8, 2013

    Decided:

    December 6, 2013

    Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Haywood Lee Chavis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Lisa Rae McKeel,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Haywood Lee Chavis, Jr. appeals the district courts
    order

    denying

    his

    motion

    for

    sentence

    reduction

    under

    18

    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.


    Chavis,
    2013;

    No.

    4:04-cr-00087-WDK-JEB-2

    entered

    June

    26,

    appointment of counsel.

    2013).

    We

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    See United States v.

    (E.D.
    deny

    Va.

    filed

    Chaviss

    June

    25,

    motion

    for

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like