Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gray, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Roy Gray's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court also denied Gray's request to appoint counsel to represent him on appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7667

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Roy Gray's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court also denied Gray's request to appoint counsel to represent him on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Gray, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Roy Gray's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court also denied Gray's request to appoint counsel to represent him on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7667

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ROY W. GRAY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
    Norman K. Moon,
    District Judge. (3:99-cr-00086-nkm-1)

    Submitted:

    December 11, 2008

    Decided:

    December 18, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Roy W. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Roy W. Gray appeals the district courts order denying
    his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006) motion.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Gray, No. 3:99-cr-00086-nkm-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2008).


    We deny Grays motion to appoint counsel.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like