Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Delcid, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Dirrlo Delcid appealed the district court's denial of his motion to adjust his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's construction of Delcid's motion as a request for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and denial of the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6041

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dirrlo Delcid appealed the district court's denial of his motion to adjust his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's construction of Delcid's motion as a request for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and denial of the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Delcid, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dirrlo Delcid appealed the district court's denial of his motion to adjust his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's construction of Delcid's motion as a request for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and denial of the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6041

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DIRRLO DELCID,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (1:06-cr-00495-LMB-2)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 2008

    Decided:

    March 31, 2008

    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dirrlo Delcid, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant


    United States Attorney, James T. Strawley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
    STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dirrlo

    Delcid

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    construing his motion for sentence adjustment as a Fed. R. Crim.


    P. 35 motion for reduction of sentence and denying the motion.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See United States v. Delcid, No. 1:06-cr-00495-LMB-2 (E.D.

    Va. filed Nov. 19, 2007; entered Nov. 20, 2007).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like