Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jose Ferreira, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Ferreira's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error given that Ferreira was ineligible for the sentence reduction he sought. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-05-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6475

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Ferreira's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error given that Ferreira was ineligible for the sentence reduction he sought. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Jose Ferreira, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Ferreira's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error given that Ferreira was ineligible for the sentence reduction he sought. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6475

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOSE FERREIRA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:90-cr-00432-AVB-1)

    Submitted:

    May 23, 2013

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    AGEE,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    May 29, 2013

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jose Ferreira, Appellant Pro Se.


    Assistant United States Attorney,
    Appellee.

    Lawrence Joseph Leiser,


    Alexander, Virginia, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jose
    denying

    his

    Ferreira

    motion

    appeals

    seeking

    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).

    the

    district

    reduction

    of

    courts

    sentence

    order

    under

    18

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error, given that Ferreira is ineligible for the


    reduction that he seeks.
    the district court.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like