Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gregory Butler, JR., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Gregory Butler appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the filed documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-01-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7840

    Original Title

    United States v. Gregory Butler, Jr., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gregory Butler appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the filed documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Gregory Butler, JR., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gregory Butler appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the filed documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7840

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    GREGORY FISHER BUTLER, JR., a/k/a Gregory Fisher Butler,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Frank D. Whitney,
    District Judge. (3:00-cr-00169-FDW-4)

    Submitted:

    January 22, 2013

    Decided: January 25, 2013

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gregory Fisher Butler, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth
    Ray,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Asheville,
    North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory

    Fisher

    Butler,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion


    for sentence reduction.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Butler, No. 3:00-cr-

    00169-FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2012).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like