Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wayne Joyner, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    Wayne Edward Joyner appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reduction of sentence under Rule 36 and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Joyner, No. 1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2 (E.D. Va. July 31, 2015). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7459

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wayne Edward Joyner appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reduction of sentence under Rule 36 and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Joyner, No. 1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2 (E.D. Va. July 31, 2015). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    17 views2 pages

    United States v. Wayne Joyner, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wayne Edward Joyner appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reduction of sentence under Rule 36 and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Joyner, No. 1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2 (E.D. Va. July 31, 2015). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7459

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    WAYNE EDWARD JOYNER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Liam OGrady, District
    Judge. (1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2015

    Decided:

    December 22, 2015

    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wayne Edward Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wayne
    denying
    (2012)

    his

    Edward
    Fed.

    motions.

    the

    R.

    district

    appeals

    Crim.

    We

    reversible error.
    by

    Joyner

    have

    P.

    36

    the

    district

    and

    18

    reviewed

    the

    courts

    U.S.C.
    record

    order

    3582(c)(2)
    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Joyner,

    No.

    1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2 (E.D. Va. July 31, 2015).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like