Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. David Blackmon, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    David Michael Blackmon appealed a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Blackmon's motion for the reasons stated by the district court. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7144

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    David Michael Blackmon appealed a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Blackmon's motion for the reasons stated by the district court. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. David Blackmon, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David Michael Blackmon appealed a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Blackmon's motion for the reasons stated by the district court. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7144

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DAVID MICHAEL BLACKMON, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Concord,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:01-cr-00184-GCM-5)

    Submitted:

    November 1, 2012

    Decided:

    November 6, 2012

    Before SHEDD, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Michael Blackmon, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina;
    Gretchen C. F. Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David
    order

    denying

    Michael
    his

    Blackmon

    motion

    for

    appeals

    the

    sentence

    district

    reduction

    courts

    under

    18

    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    See United States v.

    Blackmon, No. 3:01-cr-00184-GCM-5 (W.D.N.C. June 27, 2012).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like