Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Macon v. Rogers, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Corbin X. Macon filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against W.P. Rogers which was denied by the district court. Macon appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and concurred with the reasons provided by the district court for denying Macon's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-04-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7824

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Corbin X. Macon filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against W.P. Rogers which was denied by the district court. Macon appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and concurred with the reasons provided by the district court for denying Macon's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Macon v. Rogers, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Corbin X. Macon filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against W.P. Rogers which was denied by the district court. Macon appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and concurred with the reasons provided by the district court for denying Macon's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7824

    CORBIN X. MACON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    W. P. ROGERS, Regional Director,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:05-cv-00358)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2007

    Decided:

    April 5, 2007

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Corbin X. Macon, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF


    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Corbin

    X.

    Macon

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    Rogers, No. 2:05-cv-00358 (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2006).

    Macon v.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like