Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • El Kassemy v. Telvista, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Elizabeth Ann El Kassemy (the appellant) and Telvista, Inc. (the appellee). The district court denied El Kassemy relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1311

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Elizabeth Ann El Kassemy (the appellant) and Telvista, Inc. (the appellee). The district court denied El Kassemy relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    El Kassemy v. Telvista, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Elizabeth Ann El Kassemy (the appellant) and Telvista, Inc. (the appellee). The district court denied El Kassemy relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1311

    ELIZABETH ANN EL KASSEMY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    TELVISTA, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Danville.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (4:08-cv-00018-jlk-mfu)

    Submitted:

    June 22, 2009

    Decided:

    June 29, 2009

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Elizabeth Ann El Kassemy, Appellant Pro Se.


    Agnis Chandra
    Chakravorty, Frank Kenneth Friedman, WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Elizabeth Ann El Kassemy appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    El Kassemy v. Telvista, Inc., No. 4:08-cv-00018-jlk-mfu

    (W.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like