Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Epps v. VA Dept Corrections, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Clarence Epps, Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Virginia Department of Corrections and other defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying relief. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-12-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6598

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Clarence Epps, Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Virginia Department of Corrections and other defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying relief. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Epps v. VA Dept Corrections, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Clarence Epps, Jr. in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Virginia Department of Corrections and other defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying relief. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6598

    CLARENCE EPPS, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; PROBATION
    AND PAROLE; CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
    Judge. (1:06-cv-00274-TSE)

    Submitted:

    December 13, 2006

    Decided:

    December 27, 2006

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Clarence Epps, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Clarence Epps, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief in this 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) action.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Epps v.

    Virginia Dept. of Corr., No. 1:06-cv-00274-TSE (E.D. Va. Mar. 21,


    2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like