Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Oscar Andrews v. United States, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Oscar Andrews, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his §2241 habeas petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-11-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6786

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Oscar Andrews, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his §2241 habeas petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Oscar Andrews v. United States, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Oscar Andrews, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his §2241 habeas petition. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6786

    OSCAR ANDREWS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:10-hc-02160-FL)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2011

    Decided:

    November 23, 2011

    Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Oscar Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. William Ellis Boyle, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Oscar

    Andrews,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241


    (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Andrews v. United States,

    No. 5:10-hc-02160-FL (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2011).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like