Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Cooper, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Eugene Cooper's motion for reduction of sentence. Cooper appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling for the same reasons cited in its October 23, 2009 decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8010

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Eugene Cooper's motion for reduction of sentence. Cooper appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling for the same reasons cited in its October 23, 2009 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Cooper, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Eugene Cooper's motion for reduction of sentence. Cooper appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny the motion. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling for the same reasons cited in its October 23, 2009 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8010

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    EUGENE E. COOPER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    C. Weston Houck, Senior District
    Judge. (4:00-cr-01033-CWH-2)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2009

    Decided:

    December 31, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eugene E. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene E. Cooper appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See United States v. Cooper, No. 4:00-

    cr-01033-CWH-2 (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like