Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Verdell Rashaan Jones appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jones' motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7966

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Verdell Rashaan Jones appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jones' motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    United States v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Verdell Rashaan Jones appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jones' motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7966

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    VERDELL RASHAAN JONES,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:00-cr-00230-JRS-1)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2010

    Decided:

    March 4, 2010

    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Verdell Rashaan Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Verdell

    Rashaan

    Jones

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006) motion for reduction


    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Jones, No. 3:00-cr-00230-JRS-1

    (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like