Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Mario Salas, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Mario Salas appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal judgment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons provided by the lower court in denying Salas' motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-03-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7936

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mario Salas appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal judgment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons provided by the lower court in denying Salas' motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Mario Salas, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mario Salas appealed the district court's denial of his motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal judgment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons provided by the lower court in denying Salas' motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7936

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MARIO SALAS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (3:98-cr-00166-JRS-1)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 2014

    Decided:

    March 28, 2014

    Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mario Salas, Appellant Pro Se.


    Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mario Salas appeals the district courts order denying
    his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in
    his criminal judgment.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See United States v. Salas, No. 3:98-cr-

    00166-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2013).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like