Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gray v. Richmond Public Schools, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Richmond Public Schools in Martha Gray's Title VII age discrimination lawsuit. Gray alleged she experienced age discrimination but the district court found no reversible error. The Court of Appeals also reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning that Gray did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claim.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-11-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1501

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Richmond Public Schools in Martha Gray's Title VII age discrimination lawsuit. Gray alleged she experienced age discrimination but the district court found no reversible error. The Court of Appeals also reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning that Gray did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claim.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Gray v. Richmond Public Schools, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Richmond Public Schools in Martha Gray's Title VII age discrimination lawsuit. Gray alleged she experienced age discrimination but the district court found no reversible error. The Court of Appeals also reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning that Gray did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claim.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1501

    MARTHA GRAY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RICHMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, District
    Judge. (CA-04-692-3)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 2005

    Decided:

    November 4, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Martha Gray, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephanie Ploszay
    MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Karn,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Martha Gray appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment in favor of the defendant in her Title VII action
    in which she alleged age discrimination.

    We have reviewed the

    record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the


    reasoning of the district court.

    See Gray v. Richmond Pub. Sch.,

    No. CA-04-692-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 2005).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like