Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Zaman Ashraf, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Zaman Ashraf appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7560

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Zaman Ashraf appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Zaman Ashraf, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Zaman Ashraf appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7560

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    ZAMAN ASHRAF, a/k/a Pop,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:03-cr-00458-REP-3)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 2013

    Decided:

    August 2, 2013

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Zaman Ashraf, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Zaman
    denying

    his

    Ashraf

    motion

    for

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    appeals

    the

    reduction

    district
    of

    courts

    sentence,

    18

    order
    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Ashraf,

    No.

    3:03-cr-00458-REP-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2012).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like