Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Starks Fincher, JR., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes an unpublished decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Starks Fincher Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-03-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-8161

    Original Title

    United States v. Starks Fincher, Jr., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes an unpublished decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Starks Fincher Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Starks Fincher, JR., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes an unpublished decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Starks Fincher Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-8161

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    STARKS FINCHER, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (7:08-cr-01219-GRA-1)

    Submitted:

    February 11, 2013

    Decided:

    March 19, 2013

    Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Starks Fincher, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Starks
    order

    denying

    Fincher,

    his

    18

    U.S.C.

    reduction of sentence.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    3582(c)(2)

    district
    (2006)

    argument

    adequately

    motion

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    7:08-cr-01219-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 13, 2012).


    oral

    courts

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Fincher,

    No.

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like