Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gumercindo J. Gonzalez, 11th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Allen P. Pegg, the appointed counsel for Gumercindo Gonzalez, to withdraw from representing Gonzalez on appeal. The court conducted an independent review of the record and agreed with Pegg's assessment under Anders v. California that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed Gonzalez's convictions and sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-05-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-15263

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Allen P. Pegg, the appointed counsel for Gumercindo Gonzalez, to withdraw from representing Gonzalez on appeal. The court conducted an independent review of the record and agreed with Pegg's assessment under Anders v. California that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed Gonzalez's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Gumercindo J. Gonzalez, 11th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Allen P. Pegg, the appointed counsel for Gumercindo Gonzalez, to withdraw from representing Gonzalez on appeal. The court conducted an independent review of the record and agreed with Pegg's assessment under Anders v. California that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed Gonzalez's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________

    FILED
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-15263
    MAY 24, 2011
    Non-Argument Calendar
    JOHN LEY
    ________________________
    CLERK

    D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20490-JEM-1


    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus

    GUMERCINDO J. GONZALEZ,
    llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

    Defendant-Appellant.

    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (May 24, 2011)
    Before WILSON, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Allen P. Pegg, appointed counsel for Gumercindo Gonzalez, has filed a
    motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit
    of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
    reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
    and Gonzalezs convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like