Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Garnica, 11th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Daniel Castillo, the appointed counsel for Pascaul Garnica, filed a motion to withdraw from representing Garnica in his direct criminal appeal. Castillo also filed an Anders brief indicating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found Castillo's assessment to be correct and that there are no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted Castillo's motion to withdraw and affirmed Garnica's conviction and sentence under Count One.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-10578

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Daniel Castillo, the appointed counsel for Pascaul Garnica, filed a motion to withdraw from representing Garnica in his direct criminal appeal. Castillo also filed an Anders brief indicating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found Castillo's assessment to be correct and that there are no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted Castillo's motion to withdraw and affirmed Garnica's conviction and sentence under Count One.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Garnica, 11th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Daniel Castillo, the appointed counsel for Pascaul Garnica, filed a motion to withdraw from representing Garnica in his direct criminal appeal. Castillo also filed an Anders brief indicating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found Castillo's assessment to be correct and that there are no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted Castillo's motion to withdraw and affirmed Garnica's conviction and sentence under Count One.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    FILED
    ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-10578
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________

    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    DEC 02, 2010
    JOHN LEY
    CLERK

    D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00349-JSM-TGW-1


    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    llllllllll

    lllllllllll

    Plaintiff-Appellee,

    versus

    PASCAUL GARNICA,
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (December 2, 2010)
    Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Daniel L. Castillo, appointed counsel for Pascaul Garnica in this direct


    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
    738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
    record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
    correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
    issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garnicas
    conviction and sentence under Count One are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like