Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Vincent Hudson, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    Vincent Hudson appealed his convictions and sentences in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Hudson's appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw, along with an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Hudson's convictions and sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-15480

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Vincent Hudson appealed his convictions and sentences in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Hudson's appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw, along with an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Hudson's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    17 views2 pages

    United States v. Vincent Hudson, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vincent Hudson appealed his convictions and sentences in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Hudson's appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw, along with an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Hudson's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 14-15480

    Date Filed: 12/07/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-15480
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00078-PGB-TBS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    VINCENT HUDSON,
    a.k.a. Goldie,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (December 7, 2015)
    Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-15480

    Date Filed: 12/07/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Thomas Dale, appointed appellate counsel for Vincent Hudson, has filed a
    motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
    independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the
    relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
    entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is
    GRANTED, and Hudsons convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like