Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Patrick M. English, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Patrick M. English was convicted in a district court. His appointed counsel, D. Nicole Williams, filed a brief to withdraw from further representation under Anders v. California, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After an independent review of the record, the circuit court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming both English's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-08-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-15446

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Patrick M. English was convicted in a district court. His appointed counsel, D. Nicole Williams, filed a brief to withdraw from further representation under Anders v. California, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After an independent review of the record, the circuit court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming both English's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Patrick M. English, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Patrick M. English was convicted in a district court. His appointed counsel, D. Nicole Williams, filed a brief to withdraw from further representation under Anders v. California, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After an independent review of the record, the circuit court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming both English's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 14-15446

    Date Filed: 08/10/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-15446
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00003-WLS-TQL-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    PATRICK M. ENGLISH,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (August 10, 2015)
    Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-15446

    Date Filed: 08/10/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    D. Nicole Williams, appointed counsel for Patrick M. English in this appeal,


    has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a
    brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
    493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels
    assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
    examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels
    motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Englishs conviction and sentence is
    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like