Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Christopher Gregory Herrera, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Christopher Herrera was convicted of a crime and appealed his conviction and sentence. His appointed counsel filed a brief to withdraw from further representation, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After an independent review, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming Herrera's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-12484

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Christopher Herrera was convicted of a crime and appealed his conviction and sentence. His appointed counsel filed a brief to withdraw from further representation, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After an independent review, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming Herrera's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Christopher Gregory Herrera, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Christopher Herrera was convicted of a crime and appealed his conviction and sentence. His appointed counsel filed a brief to withdraw from further representation, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After an independent review, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming Herrera's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 14-12484

    Date Filed: 04/22/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-12484
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00423-RDP-SGC-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    CHRISTOPHER GREGORY HERRERA,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    __________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Alabama
    _________________________
    (April 22, 2015)
    Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Katherine P. Luker, appointed counsel for Christopher Herrera in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
    and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
    L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

    Case: 14-12484

    Date Filed: 04/22/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because


    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Herrera=s conviction and sentence
    are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like