Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. William Campbell, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed William Campbell's convictions and sentences. Campbell's attorney, Charles Brant, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming Campbell's convictions and sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-15405

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed William Campbell's convictions and sentences. Campbell's attorney, Charles Brant, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming Campbell's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. William Campbell, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed William Campbell's convictions and sentences. Campbell's attorney, Charles Brant, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming Campbell's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 13-15405

    Date Filed: 04/13/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-15405
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00024-CAR-CHW-2

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    WILLIAM CAMPBELL,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (April 13, 2015)
    Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 13-15405

    Date Filed: 04/13/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Charles Brant, counsel for William Campbell, has moved to withdraw from
    further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion is GRANTED, and Campbells
    convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like