Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Shawn Peter Springer, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted counsel's motion to withdraw from representing Shawn Springer on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court affirmed Springer's convictions and sentences, finding no issues of merit to argue. The three-judge panel unanimously concluded that the appeal lacked arguable issues for reversal based on the requirements of Anders v. California.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-03-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-13559

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted counsel's motion to withdraw from representing Shawn Springer on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court affirmed Springer's convictions and sentences, finding no issues of merit to argue. The three-judge panel unanimously concluded that the appeal lacked arguable issues for reversal based on the requirements of Anders v. California.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Shawn Peter Springer, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted counsel's motion to withdraw from representing Shawn Springer on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court affirmed Springer's convictions and sentences, finding no issues of merit to argue. The three-judge panel unanimously concluded that the appeal lacked arguable issues for reversal based on the requirements of Anders v. California.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 13-13559

    Date Filed: 03/20/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-13559
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00215-RCV-GRJ-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    SHAWN PETER SPRINGER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (March 20, 2015)
    Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 13-13559

    Date Filed: 03/20/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Angela Wright, counsel for Shawn Springer, has moved to withdraw from
    further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
    Springers convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like