Case 1: 10-cv-00151-RCL Document 30 Filed OS/24/10 Page 1 of 7

1
2
3
Dr. Orly Taitz, esq
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
4 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
5 E-Mail: drtaitz@yahoo.com
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

8 Dr. ORL Y T AITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §

Plaintiff, §HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH
9 § PRESIDING
v. § Civil Action: 10-151 RCL
10 §
Barack Hussein Obama, § ADDENDUM TO REPL Y TO
11 § OPPOSITION TO MOTION
§ FOR RECONSIDERATION
12 §
§
19 §
Defendant. §
20
§
21
Your Honor,
22
Part of the complaint in this action is a FOIA request. Mr. Obama, defendant in
23
this case, via US attorney's office sought dismissal of a FOIA request due to the fact
24
that the refusal of information request by the Social Security administration was not
25
final. Your Honor initially agreed, stating that the response from the Social Security
26
administration was not final. Until now Taitz could not obtain a response from SSN,
27
stating that it is a final decision.
28
Yesterday Taitz received a letter from Jonathan R. Cantor, Executive Director of
Office of Privacy and Disclosure of the Social Security Administration dated and
signed May 18, 2010. (Exhibit 1 Letter and envelope) As a stroke of providence the
letter states "This is our final decision in this matter. If you still believe the decision
is incorrect, however, the law permits you to seek review in a district court of the
United States".

Taitz v Obama. Addendum to Reply to Motion for reconsideration

1
 Case 1: 10-cv-00151-RCL Document 30 Filed OS/24/10 Page 2 of 7

1
2
3 As such an impediment was lifted, and the Plaintiff respectfully requests this
4 Honorable court to grant her motion for reconsideration, so that the matter can be
5 heard on the merits.
6 Legal Argument
7 In regards to the content of the response from the Social Security Administration,
8 it relies on the finding of Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom
9 ofthe Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989).
10 It concedes following points:
11 1. Under 5U.S.C. §552(b)(6) exemption from the FOIA Taitz can obtain
12 Obama's application for the Social Security without Obama's consent, if other
19 conditions are fulfilled.
20 2. Social security or court cannot consider the identity of the requester- therefore
21 the court cannot deny Taitz request due to her lack of standing or lack of
22 particularized injury
23 3. Social Security or courts cannot consider the purpose for which the person
24 requests the information.
25 4. Social security administration is obligated to provide information, ifthere is a
26 public interest in knowing how SSA administers the Social Security Act.
27 5. The only objection to Taitz request by the SSA, is their claim that "disclosure
28 of records containing personal information about President Obama would not
shed light on how the agency performs its statutory duties". This is the reason
SSA provides as justification for their refusal to provide the information in
question.
6. Taitz appeals this decision on following grounds:
a. Official on line records of Selective service confirm that Barack Obama has
been using SS number _ 4425.

Taitz v Obama. Addendum to Reply to Motion for reconsideration

2
 Case 1: 10-cv-00151-RCL Document 30 Filed OS/24/10 Page 3 of 7

1
2
3 b. Information requested does not represent personal information of Mr.
4 Obama, but rather personal information of another individual born in
5 1890, who would have been 120 years old, who is most probably deceased,
6 but whose death was either never reported to the Social Security
7 Administration or was deleted from the records of the Social Security
8 Administration prior or around 1986, and the number was unlawfully
9 assumed by Mr. Obama. According to previously submitted sworn affidavit
10 of recently retired senior deportation officer with the department of Homeland
11 Security Mr. John Sampson, this Social Security number was issued to another
12 individual in the state of Connecticut between 1976-1977, while Obama never
19 resided there.
20 c. One of the printouts provided by Mr. Sampson show Mr. Obama's origin in
21 Equatorial Guiney, which is different from the official information stating his
22 origin to be Hawaii and Kenya.
23 d. According to previously submitted sworn affidavit from Susan Daniels,
24 licensed private investigator, certified by the Department of Homeland
25 Security, this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut
26 between 1976-1977, to an individual born in 1890. As Mr. Obama never
27 resided in CT and was not born in 1890, Ms. Daniels concludes that this is not
28 his SS number. Ms. Daniels provided a follow up report, showing that
according to multiple national databases there are numerous Social Security
numbers connected to name Barack Obama and Michelle Obama, none of
which were issued in Hawaii.
e. According to memoirs by Mr. Obama, such as Dreams From My Father Mr.
Obama started working in Baskin Robbins store in Honolulu HI around 1975-

Taitz v Obama. Addendum to Reply to Motion for reconsideration

3
 Case 1: 10-cv-00151-RCL Document 30 Filed OS/24/10 Page 4 of 7

1
2
3 1976, he needed SS number to obtain employment, and he would have had to
4 obtain a SS number from HI, not CT.
5 f. According to a previously submitted sworn Affidavit by retired elite Scotland
6 Yard officer of anti organized crime and anti communist proliferation units
7 Mr. Neil Sankey, there are multiple records in National databases, showing
8 Obama using multiple Social Security numbers, which are either numbers of
9 deceased individuals or numbers never assigned, none of which were issued in
10 HI.
11 g. According to the sworn declaration by forensic export Sandra Ramsey-Lines,
12 Obama's short version certification of live birth provided to the public cannot
19 be considered as genuine without forensic examination of the original birth
20 certificate, which Obama refuses to unseal. Lack of valid original birth
21 certificate with the name of the doctor and the name ofthe hospital and
22 signatures, could attest to the foreign birth and could explain the need to seek
23 SS numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.
24 h. Madeleine Payne Dunham, Obama's maternal grandmother, used to volunteer
25 in Oahu circuit court probate department, where she was able to obtain SS
26 numbers of deceased in individuals. Additionally, both Ms. Payne and
27 Obama's mother Ann Dunham(Obama, Soetoro) worked as loan officers and
28 had an opportunity to view SS numbers of others.
1. As the public has a right to know how SSA performs its statutory duties, the
public has a right to know how Obama obtained these SS numbers, and see the
original application for SS number .""T""T"J, as well as other numbers
used by Obama according to National databases.
J. Without such disclosure the public will have no trust and confidence that SSA
properly performs its statutory duties, specifically in light of the fact that an

Taitz v Obama. Addendum to Reply to Motion for reconsideration

4
 Case 1: 10-cv-00151-RCL Document 30 Filed OS/24/10 Page 5 of 7

1
2
3 individual occupying the highest office in the land, could get there using
4 Social Security numbers of others.
5 k. Public has a right to know, what happens to estates of individuals, who are
6 deceased, and whose death was never reported.
7 1. The public has a right to know ifthis breach of SSA is limited to Obama, or
8 whether it is widespread.
9 m. Taitz would venture to submit to the court, that there was never a more
10 justified need for a disclosure, as there is in this case, with a SSN wrongfully
11 assumed and used by a President and Commander in Chief.
12 n. Taitz will be willing to consent to have initial discovery under seal and in
19 camera.
20 o. Taitz is requesting discovery to be done expeditiously, as she is continuously
21 subjected to death threats Exhibit 2, which would not stop, as long as this mystery
22 exists and there is an incentive for some to intimidate attorneys seeking answers.
23 Taitz has a family and three children, which makes this matter more urgent.
24
25 Wherefore, Taitz respectfully requests this Honorable court to grant her motion
26 for reconsideration.
27
28

/s/ DR ORL Y TAlTZ ESQ

By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (California Bar 223433)
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel.: 949-683-5411; Fax: 949-766-7603

Taitz v Obama. Addendum to Reply to Motion for reconsideration

5
 Case 1: 10-cv-00151-RCL Document 30 Filed OS/24/10 Page 6 of 7

1
2
3
E-Mail: drtaitz@yahoo.com

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
19
20
21
22
23
24
PROOF OF SERVICE
25
26 I CERTIFY THAT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ABOVE
27 PLEADINGS WERE SERVED on 05.24.10. on
28 Alan Burch, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia
5554th str.,N.W.
Washington D.C. 20530 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
/s/Orly Taitz

Dr. Orly Taitz Esq

29839 Santa Margarita PKWY
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Taitz v Obama. Addendum to Reply to Motion for reconsideration

6
 Case 1: 10-cv-00151-RCL Document 30 Filed OS/24/10 Page 7 of 7

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11
12
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Taitz v Obama. Addendum to Reply to Motion for reconsideration