This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-11510. The order grants the motion of Robert W. Stickney, the appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, to withdraw from the case. After an independent review of the record, the court determined that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed Chavez's convictions and sentences.
This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-11510. The order grants the motion of Robert W. Stickney, the appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, to withdraw from the case. After an independent review of the record, the court determined that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed Chavez's convictions and sentences.
This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-11510. The order grants the motion of Robert W. Stickney, the appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, to withdraw from the case. After an independent review of the record, the court determined that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed Chavez's convictions and sentences.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-11510 Non-Argument Calendar
D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida (May 26, 2015) Before MARTIN and ANDERSON *, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The prior opinion of the panel is vacated, and this opinion is substituted for it.
This order is being entered by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 46(d).
Case: 14-11510
Date Filed: 05/26/2015
Page: 2 of 2
Robert W. Stickney, appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the defendants convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.