Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cesar Mendes and William Evenger v. Brotherhood of Railway and Airline Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, Afl-Cio-Clc, 471 F.2d 1370, 2d Cir. (1973)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary that: 1) Affirms the lower court's ruling in favor of the defendants on the plaintiffs' (Cesar Mendes and William Evenger) claims against the Brotherhood of Railway and Airline Clerks and others. 2) Cites the district court opinion below at 353 F.Supp. 137 (S.D.N.Y.1972) that formed the basis for the appeals court's affirmation. 3) Was a per curiam ruling by a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on January 15, 1973, finding no errors in the lower court's judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1973-01-15 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 471 F.2d 1370 Docket: 310

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary that: 1) Affirms the lower court's ruling in favor of the defendants on the plaintiffs' (Cesar Mendes and William Evenger) claims against the Brotherhood of Railway and Airline Clerks and others. 2) Cites the district court opinion below at 353 F.Supp. 137 (S.D.N.Y.1972) that formed the basis for the appeals court's affirmation. 3) Was a per curiam ruling by a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on January 15, 1973, finding no errors in the lower court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Cesar Mendes and William Evenger v. Brotherhood of Railway and Airline Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, Afl-Cio-Clc, 471 F.2d 1370, 2d Cir. (1973)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary that: 1) Affirms the lower court's ruling in favor of the defendants on the plaintiffs' (Cesar Mendes and William Evenger) claims against the Brotherhood of Railway and Airline Clerks and others. 2) Cites the district court opinion below at 353 F.Supp. 137 (S.D.N.Y.1972) that formed the basis for the appeals court's affirmation. 3) Was a per curiam ruling by a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on January 15, 1973, finding no errors in the lower court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    471 F.

    2d 1370
    82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2384, 70 Lab.Cas. P 13,398

    Cesar MENDES and William Evenger, Appellants,


    v.
    BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND AIRLINE CLERKS,
    FREIGHT HANDLERS,
    EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES, AFL-CIO-CLC et
    al., Appellees.
    No. 310, Docket 72-1751.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Second Circuit.
    Argued Jan. 10, 1973.
    Decided Jan. 15, 1973.

    Cesar Mendes, pro se.


    Peter G. Wolfe, New York City (Arthur M. Wisehart, New York City, on
    the brief), for appellee Railway Express Agency, Inc.
    David J. Fleming, New York City (James L. Highsaw, Highsaw &
    Mahoney, Washington, D. C., Reilly, Fleming & Reilly, New York City,
    William J. Donlon, Gen. Counsel, Brotherhood of Railway and Airline
    Clerks, Rosemont, Ill., on the brief), for appellees Brotherhood of Railway
    and Airline Clerks, R. J. Devlin, Steve Milone, and William Bannon.
    Before LUMBARD, KAUFMAN and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    The judgment is affirmed on Judge Gagliardi's opinion below, 353 F.Supp. 137
    (S.D.N.Y.1972).

    You might also like