Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 313, Afl-Cio, 351 F.2d 954, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    This document is a court case from 1965 in which the National Labor Relations Board petitioned to enforce a decision against the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 313. The Board had found that the union engaged in an illegal secondary boycott. The sole issue before the appeals court was whether there was substantial evidence to support the Board's findings. After examining the record, the court found that there was substantial evidence and enforced the Board's order against the union. The court's decision was brief, only three sentences, finding for the Board and enforcing its order based on the evidence in the record.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1965-11-09 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 351 F.2d 954 Docket: 15287_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from 1965 in which the National Labor Relations Board petitioned to enforce a decision against the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 313. The Board had found that the union engaged in an illegal secondary boycott. The sole issue before the appeals court was whether there was substantial evidence to support the Board's findings. After examining the record, the court found that there was substantial evidence and enforced the Board's order against the union. The court's decision was brief, only three sentences, finding for the Board and enforcing its order based on the evidence in the record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 313, Afl-Cio, 351 F.2d 954, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from 1965 in which the National Labor Relations Board petitioned to enforce a decision against the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 313. The Board had found that the union engaged in an illegal secondary boycott. The sole issue before the appeals court was whether there was substantial evidence to support the Board's findings. After examining the record, the court found that there was substantial evidence and enforced the Board's order against the union. The court's decision was brief, only three sentences, finding for the Board and enforcing its order based on the evidence in the record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    351 F.

    2d 954

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,


    v.
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL
    WORKERS, LOCAL 313,
    AFL-CIO, Respondent,
    No. 15287.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued Nov. 2, 1965.
    Decided Nov. 9, 1965.

    George B. Driesen, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel,


    Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost,
    Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief),
    for petitioner.
    Joseph Donald Craven, Wilmington, Del., for respondent.
    Before STALEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and COHEN, District
    Judge.
    PER CURIAM.

    This proceeding was brought by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce
    a decision by the Board which held that the respondent had engaged in a
    secondary boycott in violation of 29 U.S.C. 158(b)(4)(B). The sole issue raised
    by this petition is whether there was substantial evidence to support the
    findings of the Board. A thorough examination of the record reveals that there
    is such evidence.

    The order of the Board will be enforced, and a form of decree may be
    submitted.

    You might also like